Today's Atheist Meme of the Day. Pass this on; or don't; or edit it as you see fit; or make up your own. Enjoy!
"Many people find religion comforting" is a terrible argument for religion. Many people are comforted by the idea that global warming isn't real, too. That doesn't make this opinion helpful -- for the people who think it, or for society. And it certainly doesn't make this opinion true. Pass it on: if we say it enough times to enough people, it may get across.
Well, well, well: another statist regurgitating socialist dogma! I guess you commies just love having your property stolen from you, just as long as there is a history of tyrannical hegemony behind it! Why can't you liberals stop oppressing those who speak the truth about the global warming religion?
Posted by: Valhar2000 | August 17, 2010 at 01:33 AM
Heh. Well the Global Warming analogy is sound and I don't mind it, despite being a skeptic myself.
But I'm often surprised at how religiously atheists defend the hypothesis that man-made CO2 is causing significant global warming. Do we have any evidence for that? Seriously, do we?
Greta?
Posted by: stef | August 17, 2010 at 04:02 AM
Stef, yup.
CO2 being emitted by humans is accumulating in the atmosphere:
http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-levels-airborne-fraction-increasing.htm
Additional CO2 in the atmosphere causes significant climate change:
http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-global-warming.htm
Posted by: DSimon | August 17, 2010 at 09:34 AM
Stef,
This little chart may help you too. It's hardly comprehensive, but it boils it down like only the Information is Beautiful blog can.
http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/climate-change-deniers-vs-the-consensus/
Posted by: Doug From Dougland | August 17, 2010 at 10:05 AM
Climate computer models, which are accurate throughout prehistoric times times, are unable to reproduce the recent rise in global temperature without adding anthropogenic forcing effects, including CO2 emissions.
Also, it makes little sense to produce a sweeping generalization atheists and climatology, as the two have nothing whatsoever to do with each other - unless someone is once again trying to make atheists look as dogmatic as theists through the use of cute phrases like 'religiously defend'.
Posted by: Nigel | August 17, 2010 at 10:47 AM
If a religious faith is comforting or "just what [I] needed", that's useful ... to the degree that having the faith promotes one's values. (And there's _a_ rub. Folks don't know what to value.)
My value system is founded on the ultimate value of "the well-being of all sentience". It can be simply stated, but it's fairly complex in its implications.
The core teachings of some religions approach (in effect) an approximation of supporting my values. Thus, in those cases, whatever rationalizations or logical fallacies that lead persons to their faiths _is_ actually good. (To the degree that adherence to such faiths promotes my values.)
Sadly, most religious organizations seem to be at odds with their core teachings, so adopting the comforts of faith tends to be less of an ends-justifies-means sugary-spoonful-with-medicine situation and more of a drinking-a-sixpack-solves-my-problems situation.
I'm looking at you, hateful Christians. The teachings of Christ to be loving of _everyone_ are not easily followed or comforting to the likes of you. And I'm looking at all y'all, hateful whoevers.
Posted by: Ray | August 17, 2010 at 07:25 PM
PZ just made this point with some piquancy.
Posted by: Eclectic | January 26, 2011 at 10:29 PM