My Photo

The Out Campaign

Atheist Blogroll

Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 05/2005

« Hide and Seek: Dirty Found Magazine, issue #1 | Main | Spanking for Stagefright »



Sentimentalism? Nuh-uh! It was about the arbitrary dividing line between what is and isn't a planet. I can't help it if some narrow-minded scientists don't like a planet with a deviant path. :) I understand that only 300 out of the 2,500 attendees at the IAU convention voted on this issue. Who's to say that somebody didn't deliberately hold a Queer Quasars party the night before the vote to suppress the pro-Pluto faction?

I'd've preferred the direction where we got more planets, rather than fewer. As it is, this definition seems to be written just to get Pluto off the list. It also doesn't speak to what a planet is outside our own solar system. We might need a better definition sooner than they think.

Greta Christina

Well, I was kind of kidding with the "rank sentimentalism" comment. But in all seriousness (or in some seriousness, anyway), it did seem like everyone agreed that Pluto is in a significantly different category from the other eight planets. And it seemed like the primary foundation of the "let's define 'planet' to include Pluto plus Ceres and Xena and whatever else" argument was "it would be sad to lose Pluto as a planet." Not good science. I think they made the right decision.

We still need a new mnemonic, though. The schoolchildren of the world are waiting!

Elsewhere on the blogosphere they came up with this:

My! Very educated morons just screwed up numerous planetariums.

Which is funny, but um.....still has the P folks.

I say needles instead of nine porcipines. It keeps the pointiness.

Bill Brent

My very elegant mother just shopped until noon.

My very elegant mother
jump-started Uncle's Nissan.

My very elegant mother just slapped us nicely.

- - - -

Or, if you must stick to the old mnemonic throughout:

My very elegant mother just sat upon Norway.



Re Pluto:

Scientifically speaking, there's really no such thing as a "planet." Not really any functional or structural thing that makes one thing a planet and another thing not. Asteroids, comets, rocky bits and slushy bits big and small all orbit the Sun pretty indifferently. I mean, look at the IAU's new definition. Size and eccentricity? That's just playing word games. It isn't anything you can do science with.

D. B. Howard

(P. S. There are some people whose small size and excessive eccentricity I dislike, but I don't go around redefining them!)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe/ Donate to This Blog!

Books of mine

Greta on SSA Speakers Bureau

  • Greta Christina is on the Speakers Bureau of the Secular Students Alliance. Invite her to speak to your group!

Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz

Powered by Rollyo

Some Favorite Posts and Conversations: Atheism

Some Favorite Posts and Conversations: Sex

Some Favorite Posts: Art, Politics, Other Stuff