Lesbian Sex With Men
Please note: This piece discusses my personal sex life, and my personal sexual history, in a certain amount of detail. Family members and others who don't want to read about that stuff, please don't. This piece was originally published on the Blowfish Blog.
This is about the first time I had sex with a guy, after I'd finally started having sex with women.
And it's about how having sex with women radically changed the way I have sex. With everybody. Men, women, everybody.
Here's what happened. I was making out with this friend of mine. Male. And this was clearly not the "just fooling around" variety of making out. This was the "lead-up to having sex" variety. We'd actually decamped from another friend's living room, where things had gotten started, and gone back to his place to keep things going. This was "making out, otherwise known as foreplay."
So we were making out on his sofa, getting increasingly hot and heavy... when for no apparent reason, his momentum slowed down. Like, a lot. Trying to figure out what the heck was happening, I asked if he wanted to get a condom and go into the bedroom... and he said, with obvious embarrassment, that he'd already come, while we were making out.
(I think it had been a while since he'd had sex.)
And here's where the "having had sex with women" part comes in.
Before I'd started having sex with women, my reaction to a guy's premature ejaculation had been pretty traditional: disappointment, frustration, embarrassment on his behalf, attempts to soothe his ego, feeling like I'd done something wrong.
But this time, my reaction was to say, casually and matter-of-factly, "Oh. Well, is that any reason to stop?"
I wasn't trying to make a statement or anything. I honestly didn't even think about it. I certainly wasn't thinking of it in terms of, "this is the great lesson I have learned from having sex with women." It was just an automatic, instinctive reaction.
But it was an automatic, instinctive reaction that was the complete opposite of the one I would have had a year or two before. It was an automatic, instinctive reaction that had been shaped by the sex I'd been having with women -- sex in which one person's orgasm didn't stop the whole train, but was simply one of many sights on a long and eventful excursion.
And here's the thing I found especially interesting:
When I said it, he was relieved.
He wasn't angry, or annoyed, or anything even remotely approaching angry or annoyed. He was relieved. He was happy.
He didn't want our encounter to be just about his orgasm, either. Especially since it had fired off before either of us was ready. "Is that any reason to stop?" was a way we could do that. It was a way he could feel good about our encounter, like a sexy, sensitive, open-minded lover instead of a gawky klutz who couldn't control himself. And it was a way we could keep on having sex. It was a way we could actually have sex that night, instead of an aborted make-out session.
And we did.
I don't even remember if we wound up fucking per se. But we had sex. Wonderful, sweet, delicious sex. For a good long while. An hour or two, if I recall correctly. With many sights on a long and eventful excursion.
Now, of course, you don't need to be bisexual to learn this lesson. Lots of straight people figure out that sex doesn't necessarily equal fucking, or even fucking and sucking. Lots of straight people figure out that the presence of an erect penis is not necessary for sex to count as sex.
But lots of other straight people never figure that out. Even today, even in our post- Monica- Lewinksy, "it depends on what your definition of 'is' is" era, the default definition of sex is still, "a hard dick going inside a hole."
And I think it's important to remember that this state of affairs doesn't just suck for women. It sucks for men, too. My friend was so disappointed and embarrassed that his premature ejaculation had screeched our evening to a halt... and he was so relieved and happy to be offered the idea that it didn't have to. The obsessive spotlight on the hard dick as the sole focal point and defining feature of sex... it makes for some seriously unsatisfied women, of course, but I think it's a raw deal for men as well. It's too much pressure on one little organ.
I'm not sure where I'm going with this. I think my point is just this: An awful lot of people, of all genders and orientations, would benefit from the kind of sex that lesbians take as a given. The kind of sex where success isn't overwhelmingly defined by one partner's "performance." The kind of sex that doesn't make a sharp distinction between "foreplay" and "sex," and that doesn't have a strong opinion about which has to happen first. The kind of sex where the journey is the destination.
I don't know where my friend is now. But I hope he remembers. I hope he remembers as fondly as I do. And I hope that from that night on, whenever he couldn't get hard, or came before he wanted to, he was able to smile and say to his lover, "Well, is that any reason to stop?"










After I read this fantastic post (and agreed with all of it, having made the same discovery myself), I then re-read the entire thing, aloud, to my husband sitting next to me.
Just brilliant. Thank you :)
xx Dee
Posted by: Curvaceous Dee | April 11, 2008 at 02:33 AM
It's not only important when it comes to premature ejaculation, but for those of us who run into ED. My ED is often psychological and finding a lover who doesn't see the problem as a reason to stop can be difficult. When I do find such a lover, it is fantastic for just the reasons you state. Women who "get it" turn it into a lot of fun, which then turns into regaining the erection.
My fist wife didn't get that and was highly critical when I couldn't get it up, which fed the problem.
Posted by: Mike Haubrich, FCD | April 11, 2008 at 03:03 AM
I found your blog via Curvaceous Dee's blog. I love this post, I really do!
I have a friend (for real LOL) that was not feeling secure in himself and I forwarded this to him to read. I wrote a post about him on my blog, "Male Intimacy in a Non-Sexual Manner".
He felt that lasting 4min was too little, and on top of it his ex-wife was refusing to be intimate with him, and mentally abusing him. I helped him the best I could, and he is doing better, but he is still feeling a little inadequate in his love-making skills.
This post is fantastic and just what he needs to read.
Thank you,
marcello
PS. I am adding you to my blogroll - great work.
Posted by: marcelloNYC | April 12, 2008 at 05:56 PM
Thank you for taking load #23 off my mind. Hah.. so guys can use fingers and hands and fists, oh my!
Thanks.
Posted by: Odd Duck | April 13, 2008 at 02:58 AM
Thank you for a great post. I used to think about these issues a lot when I was younger and still tried to figure out whether boys, girls or both was the way to go. Somewhere along the road I forgot...until today!
Posted by: Chris | April 16, 2008 at 07:49 AM
Spectacular post. For a rather lovely period of my life, I was lucky enough to be with someone who wouldn't have dreamed of stopping just because he was "done". I have never quite forgiven myself for letting him get away. ;) When a guy really gets this, it is one of the best possible things a woman can ask for in a lover.
Posted by: Improbable Bee | April 16, 2008 at 09:43 PM
This is a wonderful post. It's funny, I spend all this time tryiing to be as open-minded as possible about the big questions (gay marriage, polyamory, kink, religion, the vast sea of differing relationship styles in the world, etc, etc.), and without you writing about it, I might never have thought to question this "little" question. Or at least, it might have taken me longer.
Posted by: yogurtbacteria | April 20, 2008 at 01:28 PM
Fantastic post! Inspiring
Helped me a lot...
Thank you !
Posted by: Brazilian Guy | October 07, 2008 at 03:04 AM
I found this through Sexoteric. Great post. This is what queer sex is about for me.
Posted by: Lolita Wolf | March 05, 2009 at 09:50 AM
sdfghshsjxfcdxfchfh
Posted by: sanjayan | June 28, 2009 at 01:36 AM