Sex Crazed Sex Goddesses of Sex: Women Who Like Sex, and the Men Who Don't Appreciate Them

Dan Savage (of the Savage Love sex advice column) did this very clever thing recently. He ran a column pretending to agree with the proposition that women across the board simply aren't as interested in sex as men... and then waited for the letters to pour in, from legions of outraged women with high libidos insisting that they, you know, existed. (I almost wrote him one myself.)

But what struck me about these letters wasn't so much the raw fact of them. It wasn't that plenty of women do have high libidos, or that the problem of differing libidos in relationships cuts across gender lines. Like, duh.

What really struck me about these letters was how many of these horny women got insulted and jeered at by their male partners for being horny. Women who love sex, and who've had male partners who didn't want sex as often as they did, wrote to Dan saying they'd been called nympho, whore, a dog in heat.

It's hard to know what exactly is going on with these guys. Is this some macho thing -- the men get freaked out because men are supposed to be the sex-crazed ones who want it all the time, and if your woman wants it more than you do then that somehow makes you less of a man? Is it just a generic "blame your partner for your problems and differences" reaction -- you know, the classic "we want different things, I'm perfect, therefore my partner must be fucked-up" logic? Is it something else entirely?

I really don't know. I've never encountered this exact phenomenon. I've never had a sex partner of either gender insult me for wanting lots of sex. I've never had a sex partner call me a slut or a whore or a nympho or a dog in heat -- except in a good way.

But I have encountered something similar. Back when I was (a) screwing around a lot and (b) at least sometimes screwing around with men, I ran into this scene a fair amount: Men who said they wanted casual, no strings-attached sex -- but then got totally weird once we'd had it. ("Weird" meaning avoiding eye contact, being distant or jumpy when they'd been friendly and relaxed, doing the approach/ avoidance dance, and just being generally, you know, weird.) This wasn't true across the board... but it happened often enough for me to go, "Hm."

I'm not quite sure what that was about. Maybe these men thought they wanted casual sex... but really wanted some sort of love and commitment. Maybe they really did want casual sex, but didn't want me to want it as much as they did -- like the fact that I was so okay with it was a blow to their pride, I wasn't supposed to be able to walk away from their sweet, sweet loving so easily. Maybe the sex stirred up feelings and emotions for them -- not necessarily true love, but some sort of tenderness or vulnerability -- and my freewheeling, sang-froid attitude was actually making me an insensitive jerk. (Like I wrote in my 1996 piece Being Single, "There are times when I feel like a caricature of a straight man, and an asshole straight man at that.")

And maybe any or all of this was true, for any or all of these men -- but because men are supposed to be the ones who want casual sex, when it turned out that they didn't want it as much as they thought they did, it made them feel less manly.

Just like not wanting sex as much as the woman in their life might make some men feel less manly.

But maybe not. Maybe I'm talking out of my ass. Thoughts? Men -- have you ever been involved with a woman who wanted sex more than you did, or who wanted sex to be casual when you weren't sure about that? If so, what was that like? And women -- have you ever been with guys who wanted it less than you did, or who didn't want something casual when you did? And what was that like? And if you're gay or lesbian, has this ever been an issue -- have you had these kinds of differences with partners, and how did they play out? And if you're bi, how does that play out differently? Nosy minds want to know.

Comments

[Eclectic]

I don't have any answers, but I'm interested in the results. I just hope people use small enough words; I don't understand pair-bonding very well.

Being in a poly relationship means that if my GF wants sex and I don't, she has another BF to ask. No biggie.

What's perhaps unusual is that I've never been in a non-poly relationship. I've been in ones that had only two people in them for a time, but that didn't mean that we had to stop looking at cute MOTAS.

But it means that I very fundamentally don't understand sexual jealousy, and I think that's somehow involved with the inability to actually be casual about "casual sex".

I can say that the emotional effects of sex still surprise me sometimes, even though it makes perfect evolutionary sense that it's wired directly into the most primitive brain functions. But you'd think people would learn to anticipate that after the first few dozen times.

The other interesting thing about your experience is how it was men that gave you that reaction. It's lesbians who are stereotypically unable to have a casual relationship ("Q: What does a lesbian bring to the second date? A: A U-haul."), but perhaps having a smaller social group has taught the culture to deal more gracefully with exes. Alison Bechdel has some funny (autobiographical, not DTWOF) cartoons on the subject.

[Barb]

GF? BF? MOTAS?

Barb

[Chris S]

I have been annoyed with the male stereotype of 'simply seeking casual sex' for quite some time, since it doesn't reflect me and tends to put guys in a box. (...which I guess is true for any stereotype duh...)
But then I kinda know that about myself

[Eclectic]

Sorry, I didn't mean to be obscure.
GF = Girlfriend
BF = Boyfriend
MOTAS = Member of the appropriate sex
There's also MOTSS and MOTOS for same/opposite sex.

[Eclectic]

Purely for everyone's amusement...

No (Lesbian) Sex In The Stacks, Please
Arkansas dad sues library over lesbian sex guide; local author Felice Newman responds

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2007/05/03/violetblue.DTL

That's a very composed (and hilarious) reply. Example:

Q: According to Adams, his two sons, ages 14 and 16, were "greatly disturbed" by their discovery and apparently underwent "many sleepless nights" as a result. Do you want to comment on these statements?

A: I imagine they went through a change of bed linens as well.

[Mike]

I enjoyed your writing very much. I find myself loathing steriotypes in general. The sexism in our society makes woman interested in casual sex as "sluts" but males "players". It's annoying as hell. I wish for an physical and emotional intimacy. Does that sound hacky? Anyway, I feel men don't want to see their behavior reflected in any way by other members of the opposite sex. Because it does make them more vulnerable and changes how they feel. Gender issues are hard. It seems all inconclusive in the end. But I suppose it's all an individual view of things. People want what they want, and should not be denied or villified for actions, but should not be free of criticism or different view points. Rant over.

[c4bl3fl4m3]

I've recently had a lover whom I found to be extremely attractive and fantastically wonderful in bed. My libido had been at a lull for a while and said lover made my sexuality light up like a Christmas tree. After a bit of me wanting it every time we were together, as well as sending him erotic emails and txt messages, he called me, with a pleasant laugh, a "horndog". However, later on, in an email, when telling him about past partners who had made me feel bad because of my high libido, he told me that I should never apologize for my sex drive... not to him, not to anyone. He also reiterated this in person out loud. It made me feel better about his (albeit accurate) labeling of me.

I'm biologically female, bisexual, and non-monogamous and I've often times (most of the time?) had a higher sex drive than my primary partners, who have been primarily male. In fact, that's one of the reasons that I'm non-monogamous... because even when I'm with someone, I keep having eyes for others. I think some of the men were intimidated by it, not so much because I'm female but just because the other person wants it more than they do and I don't think they wanted to say "not tonight, I have a headache" to me.

I guess for me it's always just been. I've never really taken a step back to analyze how my various partners have taken it. I do know that at the times that I've had little to no sex drive (the effects of hormonal birth control on me), I've always felt bad because 1.) I wasn't my usual uber-horny self and 2.) because I wanted to be GGG (good, giving and game: another Dan Savage term) for my partners and help them satisfy their sexual desires.

[C. L. Hanson]

That's a fascinating experience you've had with guys who think they want NSA sex but end up being a little thrown off kilter when it happens. I think many (most?) people don't separate physical and emotional intimacy entirely. So while it seems men are more likely to want NSA sex and women are more likely to want committment/romance (without necessarily much of a sexual component), the lines are pretty blurry. So you get a whole lot of guys who think they want NSA sex (because that's what guys are supposed to want, and it sure seems like fun), but when it actually happens they end up having an unanticipated emotional reaction.

I touched on the confusion about sexual expectations in my sex on the first date post: http://lfab-uvm.blogspot.com/2006/03/immodest-proposal-sex-on-first-date.html

BTW, I love Dan Savage, and I enjoyed reading all of the letters from women who wrote in about having a high libido. It actually didn't even occur to me to write in myself because when he wrote about women not really wanting sex, I assumed he was just being sarcastic to make a point.

In my opinion, there's a huge range of "what women want" in terms of sex, love, and relationships. The cardinal (sexual) sin for me is to take what one woman wants and then project it on women in general, believing that any woman who doesn't feel the same way about her sexuality as woman X feels about her sexuality is just lying to herself, duped by the patriarchy, etc. That was the main thrust of my feminist sexuality post: http://lfab-uvm.blogspot.com/2007/02/feminist-sexuality.html

[Buck Fuddy]

Never. I have never been involved with a woman who was too interested in sex. In fact, I've only met a few women who were as interested in sex as I am, and believe me, I appreciated it!

I would never criticize a woman for having a high libido. The only thing better than a horny chick is two of them! :-)

But, on the other hand, I would never criticize a girl for having a low libido either. It's just not nice. There are a lot of things a guy can to to pique a girl's interest in sex. Criticizing her sexuality isn't one of them.

[Buck Fuddy]

c4bl3fl4m3,

Yes, definitely take it as a compliment. I's never use that term, I guess because I don't especially like dogs, but if I say a girl is horny, that's high praise.

Anyway, reading your post and mine made me realize we're both looking at this from the polyamorous perspective. I can see where this would be a real problem for monogamous people. If your partner has a higher sex drive, you'd probably be worried that they'd pursue sex outside the relationship. I'd think this would be as big a concern for women as for men though, so it's still not clear why the criticism only seems to cut one way. Maybe monogamous guys are just more controlling than monogamous women?